Home → Help and guidance →

Access=readonly in FNH

fluxmunki

19 Feb, 2010 09:12 AM via web

Admin Functions

• Edit
• Remove

Hi, I've asked a question on the nhusers list and they suggested using a mapping with a property of access=readonly as this doesn't require that a setter be available. I've tried using the ReadOnly() method and have also tried Access.

Am I doing something wrong? Is there a way to specify this access strategy in FNH?

1. Support Staff 2 Posted by James Gregory on 19 Feb, 2010 09:26 AM

   

   You should be able to use the ReadOnlyXXX methods from Access, there are several available.

   Map(x => x.ReadOnlyProperty)
     .Access.ReadOnlyPropertyThroughCamelCaseField();
   

   That specifies that the ReadOnlyProperty property doesn't have a setter, and it exposes a field that has the same name as the property, just in camel case.

   The options are:

   Access.ReadOnlyPropertyThroughCamelCaseField()
   Access.ReadOnlyPropertyThroughCamelCaseField(prefix)
   Access.ReadOnlyPropertyThroughLowerCaseField()
   Access.ReadOnlyPropertyThroughLowerCaseField(prefix)
   Access.ReadOnlyPropertyThroughPascalCaseField(prefix)
   

   The prefix overload is used when your field name matches your property name, but with some prefix.

   The available prefix options are:

   Underscore
   m
   mUnderscore
   

   Admin Functions

   • Edit
   • Remove

2. James Gregory closed this discussion on 19 Feb, 2010 12:06 PM.

Comments are currently closed for this discussion. You can start a new one.